Nelligan News
Reading Time: 2 minutes

With the proliferation of new technology and how entwined it is in our lives, the courts have recognized the need to protect personal privacy in the workplace. When it comes to the electronic devices we use at work, however, the law is still developing.

A recent arbitration decision has gone some way to clarify the issue. The Ontario Grievance Settlement Board decision Association of Management, Administrative and Professional Crown Employees of Ontario (Bhattacharya) v Ontario (Government and Consumer Services) concerned an employee who worked at a branch of the Ministry of Government Services. In 2012, a series of anonymous emails were sent to various individuals in the government alleging significant unethical conduct on the part of the employee’s Branch Director. In July 2012, a USB key was discovered, which was later found to belong to the employee. On inspection, the key contained draft emails and other files associated with the anonymous emails, as well as over one hundred confidential government documents. As a result of this discovery, the employee was terminated.

The body representing the employee, the Association of Management, Administrative and Professional Crown Employees of Ontario (AMAPCEO), argued that the inspection of the USB key was a violation of the employee’s privacy rights under section 8 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Therefore, they asserted that the evidence contained on the key should be ruled as inadmissible.

The Board, however, rejected this argument and did not bar the evidence found on the USB key. It judged that the decision to search the device was reasonable, as it was done within the scope of the employer’s authority and in the course of an investigation of employee misconduct. And while the employee certainly had an expectation of privacy over personal files stored on the USB key, he had no such expectation for work-related documents. So, on balance, the search did not violate any protected Charter right.

This case is a useful example illustrating the privacy protections that extend to digital technologies, particularly where personal files are involved. However, cases like this will always weigh the employee’s right to privacy with the legitimate business interests of an employer.

To read more about this issue, see our previous posts Bring Your Own Device to Work and Privacy in the Workplace: A New Tort is Born from our Workplace Matters blog.

If you have any more questions about digital technology and your right to privacy in the workplace, contact our Labour Law group.

This content is not intended to provide legal advice or opinion as neither can be given without reference to specific events and situations. © 2021 Nelligan O’Brien Payne LLP.

Have Questions?

Enjoy this article?
Don’t forget to share.
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Related Posts

Employment Law for Employees
Reading time: 3 mins
Not happy with a WSIB decision? Thinking about appealing the decision? Here is how to do it.
Any unfavourable WSIB decision can be appealed, however, all appeals must be filed within the documented timeframes or you will[...]
Labour Law
Reading time: 2 mins
Federal Court of Appeal Upholds Federal Jurisdiction of Telecon Union’s Certification Application
The Canadian Industrial Relations Board correctly found that the Union’s certification application fell under federal jurisdiction. In a recent Federal[...]
Labour Law
Reading time: 2 mins
Privacy Rights of Witnesses in Arbitration: Federal Court of Appeal Weighs In
In the recent decision of Canada (Attorney General) v. Philps, 2019 FCA 240, the Federal Court of Appeal weighed in[...]