Close this search box.
Nelligan News
Reading Time: 2 minutes

COVID-19 has made teleworking the new normal for many.

For the foreseeable future, remote working and work from home is here to stay. Working from home, for example, has changed our understanding of what constitutes a “workplace”. As a result, we have had to recalibrate our view of issues such as “workplace injuries”.

In a recent case Air Canada and Gentile-Patti, an Air Canada employee fell down the stairs in her home while heading to her lunch break and injured herself. The central question of the case was whether the event was a “workplace” injury, given that it occurred in the employee’s home. The judge ruled the employee did in fact suffer a “workplace injury”, and was eligible for worker’s compensation.

While the above is a Quebec case, similar questions are bound to emerge in Ontario as well. Current legislation does not provide clear guidelines on the scope of employees’ and employers’ responsibilities regarding workplace safety while working from home. What we do know is that for an employee to be compensated for a workplace injury, the incident must occur on the employer’s premises. What constitutes an “employer’s premises” is broad in scope and contextual. Moreover, whether an event will be considered a workplace injury depends on whether an employee was performing an act that was directly or incidentally related to their employment obligations.

Since workplace health and safety laws about telework remain underdeveloped, employers will benefit from creating a workplace policy to ensure that their employees remain safe while working from home, and to reduce their liability. These types of policies policy can address a variety of issues, from workspace arrangements and work schedules, to injury and accident reporting, risk assessments, and employee check-ins.

If you have questions about responsibilities surrounding telework, please contact one of our employment lawyers, or give our free helpline a call.


No data was found

This content is not intended to provide legal advice or opinion as neither can be given without reference to specific events and situations. © 2021 Nelligan O’Brien Payne LLP.

Have Questions?

Enjoy this article?
Don’t forget to share.

Related Posts

Employment Law for Employees
Reading time: 3 mins
In Koshman v Controlex Corporation, 2023 ONSC 7045, Nelligan Law lawyers Tracy Lyle and Rhian Foley successfully represented engineer Martin[...]
Employment Law for Employees
Reading time: 2 mins
The quick answer: it depends on what your contract or stock option plan states during the reasonable notice period (after[...]
Employment Law for Employees
Reading time: 2 mins
Increasing numbers of employees are struggling with mental illness and addictions in today’s workplaces. The symptoms related to these types[...]