Back to Blog

Expenditure Restraint Act – Federal Court Deems Unconstitutional. Significant decision for public sector unions

Reading Time: 2 minutes

In December 2008, Treasury Board decided to roll back a scheduled wage increase for members of the RCMP. Parliament subsequently enacted the Expenditure Restraint Act codifying the wage rollback.

An application for judicial review was filed alleging that the 2008 Treasury Board decision was unconstitutional and that the Expenditure Restraint Act was also unconstitutional to the extent it applied to the members of the RCMP.

On June 21, 2011, The Federal Court issued its decision and agreed that the Expenditure Restraint Act (and the 2008 Treasury Board decision) were unconstitutional.

In the written decision, the Federal Court concluded that the Treasury Board “refused to negotiate on a good faith basis” with the members of the RCMP (through their Pay Council), and that the unilateral cancellation of a previous agreement interfered with s. 2(d) of the Charter.”

The Federal Court went on to conclude that the decision was not justified under s. 1 of the Charter. The Court was particularly critical of the government’s justification for the legislation, stating that “the aim of providing leadership and showing restraint and respect for public money is quite abstract. It appears to be political in nature. In my opinion, this stated aim is not pressing and substantial.”

The Court also said that there was no rational connection between the wage limit and the other purpose (reducing upward pressure on wages), stating “a wage increase limit that applies to the entirety of the federal public service, covering employees who are neither blue nor white collar workers such as RCMP Members, is not rationally connected to the reduction of upward pressure on the private sector to increase wages which could lead to job losses.” The legislation was also not minimally impairing: the only justification for not consulting the Pay Council was lack of time, and the Court noted that the government had time to consult other unions — just not the Pay Council.

 

Read More About
Related Categories

Full Range of 
Legal Expertise

Explore practical articles, guides, and resources designed to help you understand legal issues, stay informed, and feel confident about your next steps.
Boating Accidents in Ontario: Understanding Liability on the Water

Boating is a favourite summer pastime of Ontarians and we are lucky to have many beautiful lakes and rivers

Continue Reading

Voluntary Departure Packages: What to Know Before You Decide

Recent media coverage has drawn renewed attention to voluntary departure packages, sometimes called buyouts. In April 2026, CBC News

Continue Reading

Malini Vijaykumar on CTV’s Ask the Expert: Severance, Toxic Workplaces, and the Risks of “DIY” Legal Advice

Malini Vijaykumar joined CTV’s Ask the Expert this week to discuss workplace rights, especially in today’s uncertain economic climate.

Continue Reading

Legal challenges can be overwhelming - 

we're here to guide you forward.

Start the conversation with a team that puts your needs first.

Choose the area of law you need help with, or select ‘I’m not sure’ if you’re uncertain.
Tell us a bit about your situation in general terms. Note that sending us a message doesn’t mean we’re officially working together yet, so if you’re not already a client, please don’t include confidential or sensitive information.