M. v. H. (recognition of same-sex spouses)

Pam MacEachern acted as co-counsel for the intervener Equality for Gays and Lesbians Everywhere (EGALE) in the Supreme Court of Canada decision M. v. H. in 1999. This landmark ruling concerned a same-sex couple, M and H, who separated after a lengthy relationship.

M sought spousal support. At that time, same-sex couples were excluded from the definition of “spouse” under the Ontario Family Law Act, which limited the definition of common-law spouse to “a man and woman”.

The top court declared that the exclusion of same-sex couples from the definition of common law spouse was unconstitutional. This was the first decision from Canada’s top court to hold that the exclusion of same-sex couples from the definition of common law spouses violated the Charter’s equality provisions under section 15 and was not justified under section 1.

This precedent lead to significant advances in relationship recognition for same-sex spouses across Canada.

 

 

Enjoy this article? Don't forget to share.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Related Posts

Estates Law
Blog
Reading time: 3 mins
In today’s housing market, buying a home is harder than ever. With high interest rates, rising property prices, and stagnant[...]
Family Law
Blog
Reading time: 3 mins
Understanding how criminal law can influence family law decisions is essential when you’re involved in both types of proceedings. In[...]
Family Law
Blog
Reading time: 2 mins
Separation or divorce can be a difficult time for families, especially when children are involved. One of the most important[...]